Voice companion - AI governance
AI Act voice assistant
One number to call to dictate internal rules, answer team questions, train AI literacy, map real uses and keep a usable audit trail.
Short answer: Compaia is first a voice companion for setting up an AI policy, guiding employees in their daily uses and producing useful evidence for AI Act compliance.
Key points
- Voice reduces friction: employees can call the companion instead of reading a PDF or filling out a form.
- The AI policy becomes actionable: the companion answers according to internal rules, authorized tools and risky situations.
- Each useful exchange feeds usage mapping, AI literacy, recommendations and guidance evidence.
- The AI register, transparency page and audit log are outputs of the companion, not just static forms.
A simple channel for employees
Teams can call the companion to declare a use, ask whether a tool is allowed, check a confidentiality rule or understand precautions before using AI.
- Natural language questions, without legal jargon.
- Answers aligned with the company AI policy.
- Routing to human approval when the case becomes sensitive.
From AI policy to daily guidance
Compaia turns company instructions into concrete rules: what is allowed, reserved, prohibited or subject to approval depending on tools, data, teams and purposes.
- Creation or improvement of an internal AI policy.
- Guidance adapted to tools actually used: ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude, Gemini or business solutions.
- Continuous AI literacy training connected to real use cases.
Evidence without paperwork
Calls and declarations progressively structure the AI register, recommendations, guidance statuses and evidence expected to steer compliance.
- Mapping of declared AI uses.
- Audit log and history of sensitive actions.
- Transparency page and follow-up of guided people.
Frequently asked questions
Is Compaia only compliance software?
No. Compliance is an important output, but the heart of the product is the voice companion: it helps create the AI policy, answers employees, trains them and turns real uses into exploitable evidence.
Why use a voice assistant instead of an LMS or register?
Because employees mostly need an answer at the moment they use AI. Voice lets them ask simply: may I send this document, use this tool, summarize this meeting or generate this content?
What does the companion produce after calls?
It structures information into an AI register, recommendations, usage rules, AI literacy elements, guidance evidence, history and a public transparency page according to company settings.